new video loaded: 48 Hours Without A.I.

A.J. Jacobs went 48 hours without interacting with artificial intelligence. That meant more than just avoiding generative A.I. tools like ChatGPT – he did his best to not interact with any products that used any kind of machine-learning algorithms in their production, marketing or distribution. This was more limiting than expected; Jacobs needed to find ways around using electricity, running water and more. The 48-hour experiment revealed just how embedded artificial intelligence already is in our daily lives.

By A.J. Jacobs, Edward Vega and Melanie Bencosme

October 29, 2025

The post 48 Hours Without A.I. – The New York Times appeared first on Our Story Insight.

Over 300 writers, scholars, and public intellectuals have pledged to not contribute to the New York Times’ Opinion section until three demands have been met. The demands address the anti-Palestinian bias in the paper’s op-ed pages, which have been a frequent target of criticism during Israel’s genocide and war. The writers are withholding their labor until the Opinion pages take “accountability for its biased coverage and commits to truthfully and ethically reporting on the U.S.-Israeli war on Gaza.”

The group of “writers of conscience” include Rima Hassan, Rashida Tlaib, Kaveh Akbar, Sally Rooney, Tareq Baconi, Viet Thanh Nguyenm, Greta Thunberg, Elia Suleiman, Plestia Alaqad, Hannah Einbinder, Andreas Malm, Isabella Hammad, Mohammed El-Kurd, Rupi Kaur, Jia Tolentino, Alana Hadidm, China Miéville, Ghassan Abu-Sittah, and many more.

Lit Hub’s Jonny Diamond and Dan Sheehan are among those who signed this collective commitment as well.

Almost 150 past Times contributors have signed the pledge, and the coalition also includes a number of Palestinian solidarity groups like Writers Against the War on Gaza (WAWOG), the Palestinian Youth Movement (PYM), and the Palestinian Feminist Collective (PFC).

The pledge condemns the “paper’s decades-long practice of acting as a bullhorn for the Israeli government and military,” its “anti-Arab and anti-Palestinian biases,” and makes three demands:

1. The newsroom must conduct a review of anti-Palestinian bias and produce new editorial standards for Palestine coverage.

2. The newsroom must retract the widely debunked investigation “Screams Without Words.”

3. The Editorial Board must call for a U.S. arms embargo on Israel.

There is more detail in the group’s longer statement. 

For Palestinians, the consequences of Western media bias can be lethal. The pledge’s statement opens with a quote from Palestinian journalist Hossam Shabat, who wrote, “Language makes genocide justifiable. A reason why we are still being bombed after 243 days is because of The New York Times and most Western media.” Shabat was assassinated by Israel months after writing this.

“We owe it to the journalists and writers of Palestine to refuse complicity with the Times,” the statement concludes, “and to demand that the paper account for its failures, such that it can never again manufacture consent for mass slaughter, torture, and displacement.”

The full statement and list of signatories are on boycottdivestunsubscribe.com.

Like this:

Like Loading…

The post » 300+ pledge to boycott the New York Times’ op-ed page over their anti-Palestinian bias. appeared first on Our Story Insight.

Jay-Z says Caesars Palace will help Times Square remain at the ‘global center of entertainment’

“Times Square is the heartbeat of New York,” Carter said. “With Caesars Palace Times Square, we’re investing in this community, creating real opportunities, and building on the legacy of the world’s crossroads.

“Our plan delivers generational economic growth. As we’ve seen in cities like New Orleans and London, this project will uplift local businesses, support Broadway, and ensure Times Square remains the global center of entertainment where culture and people thrive.”

A rendering of the proposed Caesars Palace Times Square casino, which would bring a luxury gaming and entertainment destination to Manhattan’s busiest hub. Credit: Image by Binyan Studios

The plan, backed by SL Green, Caesars Entertainment, Live Nation, and Roc Nation, would bring a brand-new gaming and entertainment complex to Times Square. According to organizers, the project has already secured support from more than 300 groups, including local restaurants, hotels, labor unions, and Broadway insiders.

At the two in-person hearings, hundreds of people showed up in support, with many more turned away once the room hit capacity. On top of that, thousands sent in written testimony to the Community Advisory Committee.

SL Green’s Executive Vice President, Brett Herschenfeld, said the response shows there’s a real wave of excitement building around the project. “We are proud that such a clear majority of New Yorkers have taken time to speak in favor of our project, both in-person and via email,” he said.

“Caesars Palace Times Square has always been a community-first project, and it is gratifying to see such genuine excitement throughout this public input process. This project will be transformative for Times Square and Broadway.”

Reverend Al Sharpton also threw his support behind the project, linking it to bigger conversations about diversity and ownership. “I remember as a young activist growing up how we would come to Times Square and dream of days that not only we see more of us on the stage but more of us in ownership,” Sharpton said. “We don’t have DEI right here on Broadway. So if this casino is established, it will be the first time we will have an institution on Broadway that has diversity at an ownership level.”

New York casino expected to deliver big returns

Developers say Caesars Palace Times Square would deliver about $250 million in community benefits. That includes $81 million for a neighborhood public safety plan crafted by former NYPD Commissioner Bill Bratton, $15 million to build a civil rights museum, and $5 million for the Callen-Lorde Center for Excellence in Sexual Health.

The proposal also promises big gains for Broadway, with an estimated $124 million in extra ticket sales each year and $100 million in direct support for Broadway unions. Overall, backers claim the project could generate $7 billion in direct tax revenue and $26.7 billion in local economic activity in its first decade.

The vision for the development features nearly 1,000 hotel rooms, over 150,000 square feet of gaming space, a Caesars Sportsbook inside The 40/40 Club, spa facilities, and restaurants led by top chefs. A Broadway theater would also get a major renovation and fresh new life.

Featured image: Binyan Studios / Caesars Palace Times Square / Joella Marano / CC BY-SA 2.0

The post Jay-Z champions Caesars Palace Times Square casino as cultural investment appeared first on Our Story Insight.

Below is a small sampling of the list to get you started. There is a cultural biography of Black sci-fi icon Octavia E. Butler, an academic trip to hell, 18th-century sisters who may be transforming into dogs at night, and more.

People Like Us by Jason Mott

Katabasis by R.F. Kuang

Positive Obsession by Susana M. Morris

Fetishized by Kaila Yu

The Hounding by Xenobe Purvis

The Magician of Tiger Castle by Louis Sachar

For the complete list, visit The New York Times.

Find more news and stories of interest from the book world in Breaking in Books.

The post The Best Books Coming Out in August, According to The New York Times appeared first on Our Story Insight.

Welcome to Today in Books, our daily round-up of literary headlines at the intersection of politics, culture, media, and more.

TIME’s Best Books of the Year So Far

TIME published their list of the Best Books of the Year So Far and it’s a good mix of books considering they kept it to a mere 14 titles (how though?!). Katie Kitamura’s Audition seems to be required for any Best of So Far as does Ocean Vuong’s The Emperor of Gladness. Also, big kudos to my former PDX writing group peer Emma Pattee whose propulsive debut Tilt made the list! One of the books (I won’t say which just yet) is on my own best of so far, and a whole bunch more were on my list of anticipated reads for 2025. You can find the full list of titles here.

Carla Hayden Has Something to Say

Carla Hayden, the first woman and first African American to serve as Librarian of Congress, spoke with CBS about being fired by the Trump administration. If you were incensed by the news, let me tell you, this CBS Sunday Morning interview of Hayden about her termination will not quench those internal fires. The use of the DEI dog whistle and nonsensical lines drawn from the placement of “inappropriate books in the library for children” to the role of the Librarian of Congress from White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt would be laughable if they weren’t so heinous. Hayden saying that, upon hearing these comments, she was concerned that there wasn’t awareness around what the Library of Congress does was beyond charitable. Hayden goes on to talk about how strange it is to hear inclusion spoken of in such negative terms, about the importance of young people seeing themselves in books, and about attacks against the freedom to read and democracy itself. What grace what poise what intellect. The Trump admin may have fired Hayden but they can’t erase her legacy.

Today In Books

Sign up to Today In Books to receive daily news and miscellany from the world of books.

Stephen Colbert Launches a Book Club

Normally I’d roll my eyes and sigh, “Another celebrity book club,” but I have a soft spot for Stephen Colbert so I’ll skip the pettiness. As this announcement from the LateNighter points out, Colbert isn’t the first late night host to hit the book club–Jimmy Fallon’s book club has highlighted and promoted big hits like Liz Moore’s The God of the Woods (loved it) and Tomi Adeyemi’s Children of Blood and Bone (also loved it). Colbert is launching his own book club with Orbital, Samantha Harvey’s Booker Prize-winning sci-fi novel. I’m not clear on how many viewers participate in these late night host book club hashtag campaigns, but I’m sure authors appreciate the extra attention their books get out of it. For all my eye rolling, a celebrity endorsement can make a significant impact on book sales. Also, I am so curious about how these books get picked–does Colbert have an advisor or did he simply choose a book he liked?

Judge Grants Trump Administration Win in ALA vs. Sonderling IMLS Lawsuit

While this news is nothing to celebrate, my colleague Kelly points out that the ruling for the Trump administration in the ALA’s fight against the dismantling of the Institute for Museum and Library Services (IMLS) is more of a setback than an all-out win. Read about Judge Richard J. Leon’s decision and what this means for the case and IMLS here.

The comments section is moderated according to our community guidelines. Please check them out so we can maintain a safe and supportive community of readers!

The post TIME’s Best Books of 2025 So Far appeared first on Our Story Insight.

Their list of 31 notable novels publishing this summer includes some heavy hitters—there’s Taylor Jenkins Reid (in space!), Southern noir king S.A. Cosby, and V.E. Schwab and her historical lesbian vampires. There are some lesser-known and debut authors as well. Overall, the list seems to have a little bit of something for everyone.

Below are 10 of the books from the list to get things started.

Atmosphere: A Love Story by Taylor Jenkins Reid

Flashlight by Susan Choi

Meet Me at the Crossroads by Megan Giddings

King of Ashes by S.A. Cosby

Bury Our Bones in the Midnight Soil by V.E. Schwab

A Bomb Placed Close to the Heart by Nishant Batsha

A Witch’s Guide to Magical Innkeeping by Sangu Mandanna

People Like Us by Jason Mott

Loved One by Aisha Muharrar

The Possession of Alba Díaz by Isabel Cañas

For the entire list, visit The New York Times.

Find more news and stories of interest from the book world in Breaking in Books.

The post The Best Books of the Summer, According to the New York Times appeared first on Our Story Insight.

It was much worse than expected. President Trump’s attempt to reverse the rules of global trade through sweeping tariffs against dozens of nations, including major partners like the European Union, Japan and China, has caused a meltdown in global markets and sent corporate boardrooms scrambling.

Today, 10 percent tariffs go into effect on all of America’s trading partners except Canada and Mexico. Additional, “reciprocal” tariffs will go into effect on dozens of other nations on Wednesday. China faces the toughest levies — at least 54 percent — and it hit back with its own toll on U.S. goods yesterday. Expect a response from the E.U. next week.

Trump has argued that the economic pain caused by the tariffs will be short term and ultimately justified by a boom in the U.S. economy, but news of the measures hit investors hard. The benchmark S&P 500 closed yesterday near bear market territory, with analysts warning of an increased risk of recession.

Jerome Powell, the head of the U.S. Federal Reserve, offered a somewhat glum outlook yesterday on the prospects for growth and warned of higher prices that he acknowledged could be more than temporary.

There’s a lot going on. DealBook asked economists, investment researchers and other experts to help make sense of what’s next.

How have the new tariffs changed the risk of a recession?

We asked: Jason Furman, a professor of economics at Harvard and former economic adviser to President Barack Obama.

“The ‘known knowns’ of all the tariffs President Trump has announced so far will subtract about one percentage point from G.D.P. growth, lowering it from what would have been around 2 percent this year to something more like 1 percent. This is what you would infer from a standard macroeconomic model that is based on trade shares and how they respond to price changes.

“The problem is just how big the ‘unknown unknowns’ are: Consumer confidence is plunging, business uncertainty is the highest ever recorded, asset prices are falling, all of which only go in one direction for growth, which is down. If we have a recession, it will be these intangible perception factors that were the cause.”

Other views: In a note titled “There Will Be Blood,” JPMorgan’s chief economist on Thursday raised the odds of a global recession to 60 percent from 40 percent. “The effect of this tax hike is likely to be magnified — through retaliation, a slide in U.S. business sentiment and supply chain disruptions,” he wrote.

Do U.S. tariffs open opportunities for China?

We asked: Gabriel Wildau, a specialist on political risk in China at the advisory firm Teneo.

“Exports have been the saving grace of China’s economy in recent years, and now it will have to rely more on domestic demand to generate growth. But reduced access to the U.S. economy will force U.S. allies like Japan and South Korea, which were once firmly aligned with Washington’s efforts to contain China, to rethink that alignment.

“President Trump believes that tariffs will force global companies to invest in U.S.-based production, but this incentive might be overwhelmed by a perception among global companies that investment in the U.S. now comes with a high degree of political risk. By contrast, China’s leadership has engaged in a global charm offensive to lure multinational investors, as evidenced most recently by President Xi’s meeting with a group of 40 global executives last week.

“I’ve heard from foreign companies operating in China that senior government officials are more accessible than ever for meetings. At these meetings, these officials are highly solicitous, often directly instructing underlings to address the complaints that foreign companies raise. China has been suffering from declining foreign direct investment inflows, but the Trump shock now creates an opportunity to reverse this decline.”

Other views: Trump has targeted not only China, which faces at least 54 percent tariffs, but also many of the alternate routes, like Vietnam and Cambodia, through which Chinese goods travel to U.S. consumers as a way to avoid the stiff penalties applied to Beijing.

“If no nation can escape from tariffs, I’m wondering if global supply chains will gravitate back to China, where the economics of manufacturing are too attractive,” Han Shen Lin, China country director for the Asia Group, a consulting firm, told The Times.

“There’s also a small chance that the tariffs drive China and the E.U., the second-largest consumer market, closer together, Jeanna Smialek wrote for The Times, but “there is an even greater possibility that this moment will tear the E.U. and China further apart.”

How long does it take manufacturing companies to pivot their supply chains?

We asked: Erin McLaughlin, a senior economist at the Conference Board and former vice president of private resources at the American Council of Engineering Companies.

“It can take manufacturers anywhere from several months to years to pivot their supply chains in reaction to tariffs. Factors include the complexity of products being manufactured, whether up- and downstream suppliers can accommodate domestic production, and the long process of environmental approvals, permitting, designing, building and equipping a factory.

“Modern manufacturing facilities often include high-tech features such as robotics that guide specialized processes — advancements far more sophisticated than those of the 20th century. Companies typically place orders for such customized capital equipment years in advance.

“And, of course, new manufacturing facilities require money to build and people to operate. So additional challenges around the high cost of financing, market uncertainties including inflation and the availability of qualified labor also weigh on decisions to domesticate supply chains.”

Other views: Apple’s yearslong work to shift production of some products out of China highlights the challenges companies face in responding to changes in trade policy. But some U.S. industries are eager for tariffs, even as many economists and business leaders say they are skeptical that reviving U.S. manufacturing is even possible.

Tariffs are viewed as inflationary. Does that mean the Fed is done cutting interest rates this year?

We asked: David Seif, chief economist for developed markets at Nomura.

“We went from zero Fed cuts this year to one, so we actually raised our expected number of cuts. But all we did was pull forward cuts we previously expected in 2026 by a few months. We think the Fed will hold rates steady until December 2025.

“Ultimately, we think the increase in inflation from these tariffs will be significant, and we expect core P.C.E. will rise to above 4.5 percent year over year in 2025. This inflation will, we think, be a higher priority for the Fed than below-trend growth. The framework of our view — that the Fed will prioritize fighting tariff-induced inflation — has been consistent since Trump was elected.

“We moved the timing of Fed cuts forward primarily because the tariffs look set to hit all at once instead of being phased in. This means that the inflation hit will be sharper, but it will also be shorter. With tariffs coming into effect so quickly, we see a good chance that monthly inflation readings will turn more benign later in the year, thereby allowing the Fed to start cutting rates in December.”

Another view: Morgan Stanley sees no cuts this year; after yesterday’s blowout jobs report, the futures market was penciling in four cuts by year-end. In his first public comments since Trump announced the tariffs on Friday, Jerome Powell, the Fed chair, said that the tariffs risked stoking even higher inflation and slower growth than initially expected, and that it was “too soon to say what will be the appropriate path for monetary policy.”

Is this the end of globalization?

We asked: Ian Bremmer, the global strategist who founded Eurasia Group and GZERO Media.

“Globalization has been adrift for some time now. The United States has been on the sidelines pushing its own industrial policy — which the world saw under both Trump and Biden. But until Liberation Day, the U.S. had not been actively unwinding it. World leaders and companies still relied on economic cooperation. They sourced their products across interconnected supply chains and sold their goods around the world.

“But it’s safe to say that the era of globalization has officially ended. Much like the British after Brexit but at a global scale, we’re in whole a new era. Even if countries manage to cut deals with the U.S. in the short term, over the long term they will try to de-risk themselves from American volatility and higher prices. The message these tariffs sent were clear.”

Other views: Ryan Petersen, the chief executive and founder of Flexport, which makes supply chain logistics software, told DealBook that trade had survived events like world wars, the Black Death, colonialism and de-colonialism, and argued, “All of those things were far more disruptive to the status quo than anything we’re living through right now.” He thinks there will be more trade, not less, in 10 years.

Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala, the director general of the World Trade Organization, said in a statement yesterday that Trump’s tariffs “could lead to an overall contraction of around 1 percent in global merchandise trade volumes this year, representing a downward revision of nearly four percentage points from previous projections,” and that she was “deeply concerned about this decline and the potential for escalation.”

Thanks for reading! We’ll see you Monday.

We’d like your feedback. Please email thoughts and suggestions to dealbook@nytimes.com.

The post A Tariffs Cheat Sheet – The New York Times appeared first on Our Story Insight.

Welcome to Today in Books, our daily round-up of literary headlines at the intersection of politics, culture, media, and more.

24 New York Times-Recommended Fiction Books for Spring

Spring is right around the corner! Time to make some decisions about which books you’re going to take outside while you breathe in that fresh, verdant air. If you need an assist with your seasonal TBR, The Times has a list of 24 novels to look forward to. Suzanne Collins’ The Hunger Games prequel, Sunrise on the Reaping, is bound to be a bestseller, I’m looking forward to reading Tilt by Emma Pattee (full disclosure, I know her, but as you can see I’m not the only one excited about this book), The Buffalo Hunter Hunter by Stephen Graham Jones is also on this horror fan’s list, as are Ocean Vuong’s much-anticipated The Emperor of Gladness, and Flirting Lessons by Jasmine Guillory. This list is a great reminder that we’re set up for a sensational season of reading.

We Need Diverse Books Inaugural Reading Day!

Well this is the fun and uplifting news I needed at the end of an exhausting week. The esteemed and hardworking team over at We Need Diverse Books is organizing a day to celebrate diverse books and reading. Readers are encouraged to pick up books by people from marginalized communities on April 3rd. As many voices from the WNDB team, including Dhonielle Clayton (Blackout) and Roxane Gay (Bad Feminist), message, it’s important to make sure diverse books are on those shelves because everyone stands to benefit from reading books that represent the underrepresented. WNDB will be posting resources on how to find diverse books and will provide a diverse book to an underresourced school for every $10 donated. Schools and readers could use all the help they can get these days. Check out this article for more information on why diverse books are important and how you can participate.

Today In Books Newsletter

Sign up to Today In Books to receive daily news and miscellany from the world of books.

Thank you for signing up! Keep an eye on your inbox.

Level up your reading life while you support an independent media resource! Become an All Access member and explore our full library of exclusive bonus content and community features. Sign up now for only $6/month!

This Spicy Meta Tell-All Book Just Got Spicier

Yes, Meta won an emergency arbitration ruling against a former employee to stop her from promoting her tell-all book exposing some ugly inner workings of the social media company, but when I picture winning, this is not what I see. Early reviews of Sarah Wynn-Williams’ Careless People have made it very clear that this is a no-holds-barred kind of exposé with Mark Zuckerberg, Sheryl Sandberg, and other current and former heads of the social media company coming out fully scathed. The thing about this ruling is that it does not appear to prevent the book’s publisher, Macmillan, from moving forward with publication and promotion. And I don’t know about you, but I’m even more curious about what’s on these pages than I was a moment ago. One has to laugh reading this statement posted by a Meta spokesperson to Threads, “This ruling affirms that Sarah Wynn Williams’ false and defamatory book should never have been published.” Like, who is that even written for?

The Most Read Books on Goodreads

There’s a new top-five title in town! The Empyrean series is holding fast at the head of the most-read books on Goodreads, but an Elsie Silver romance has made the list this week. You can also find a couple of new release highlights, including a book about a unified society of humans and robots, and one that “questions how technology, privacy, and freedom can coexist.”

The comments section is moderated according to our community guidelines. Please check them out so we can maintain a safe and supportive community of readers!

The post NEW YORK TIMES Most Anticipated Spring Fiction Books appeared first on Our Story Insight.

In a release obtained exclusively by FOX Business, DHS said the TSA has more people doing “full-time union work” rather than performing screening functions at 86% of U.S. airports. 

This means that out of 432 federalized airports, 374 airports have fewer than 200 TSA Officers to perform screening functions. 

These officers are paid by the government but work “full-time on union matters” and do not retain certification to perform screening functions, DHS said. 

The department cited a recent TSA employee survey which found that more than 60% of “poor performers” are allowed to stay employed and “not surprisingly, continue to not perform.”   

These officers are paid by the government but work “full-time on union matters” and do not retain certification to perform screening functions, DHS said.  Bloomberg via Getty Images

DHS said these circumstances have impeded TSA’s chief responsibility “to safeguard our transportation systems and keep Americans safe.”  

DHS argued that eliminating collective bargaining will make airports more efficient by removing “bureaucratic hurdles that will enhance productivity, and lower passengers’ wait times in security lines.” 

DHS said Transportation Security Officers will now be promoted based on their performance, not longevity or union membership. 

According to DHS, Transportation Security Officers will now be promoted based on their performance rather than union affiliation. TNS

“Thanks to [DHS] Secretary Noem’s action, Transportation Security Officers will no longer lose their hard-earned dollars to a union that does not represent them. The Trump Administration is committed to returning to merit-based hiring and firing policies,” a DHS spokesperson said in a statement. 

“This action will ensure Americans will have a more effective and modernized [workforce] across the nation’s transportation networks—meaning shorter airport security wait times. TSA is renewing its commitment to providing a quick and secure travel process for Americans.”  

The American Federation of Government Employees, which represents TSOs, has pushed back on DHS’ claims, saying TSOs who volunteer as union representatives account for less than half a percent of all work hours performed at TSA, with fewer union representatives nationwide at TSA than the number of total screeners at 86% of individual federal airports. 

DHS says removing bureaucratic hurdles “will enhance productivity, and lower passengers’ wait times in security lines.” Getty Images

“47,000 Transportation Security Officers show up at over 400 airports across the country every single day to make sure our skies are safe for air travel. Many of them are veterans who went from serving their country in the armed forces to wearing a second uniform protecting the homeland and ensuring another terrorist attack like Sept. 11 never happens again,” AFGE National President Everett Kelley said in a statement, characterizing Friday’s announcement as an “unprovoked attack” by DHS Secretary Noem and the Trump administration. 

“They gave as a justification a completely fabricated claim about union officials – making clear this action has nothing to do with efficiency, safety, or homeland security. This is merely a pretext for attacking the rights of regular working Americans across the country because they happen to belong to a union,” Kelley said. “Our union has been out in front challenging this administration’s unlawful actions targeting federal workers, both in the legal courts and in the court of public opinion. Now our TSA officers are paying the price with this clearly retaliatory action.”

The post DHS’ major TSA change to shorten airport security wait times appeared first on Our Story Insight.

Matt Bomer (narrator), Kelly Gildea (director, co-producer), Lauren Klein (producer); Giovanni’s Room

Narrators: Clare Brown, Ayanna Dookie, Korey Jackson, Andrea Jones-Sojola, Brittany Pressley, Emana Rachelle, Malika Samuel, Heather Alicia Simms, Diana Bustelo, Tyla Collier, Alejandra Reynoso, David Sadzin, André Santana, Shaun Taylor-Corbett; Producer: Allison Light; New Nigeria County

Narrators: Andrew Garfield, Cynthia Erivo, Andrew Scott, Tom Hardy, Chukwudi Iwuji, Romesh Ranganathan, Natasia Demetriou, Francesca Mills, Alex Lawther, Katie Leung; Producers: Chris Jones, Mariele Runacre-Temple, Robin Morgan-Bentley, Nathan Freeman; George Orwell’s 1984: An Audible Original adaptation

Dominic Hoffman (narrator), Linda Korn (producer), James

Michele Norris With a Full Cast (narrator), Mike Noble (producer); Our Hidden Conversations: What Americans Really Think About Race and Identity

The post L.A. Times Book Prize Finalists Announced—Andrew Garfield and Cynthia Erivo Among Them appeared first on Our Story Insight.