<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>suit &#8211; Our Story Insight</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.ourstoryinsight.com/tag/suit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.ourstoryinsight.com</link>
	<description>Product that tells our story</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 21:04:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Stanley tumbler maker won&#8217;t have to face class-action suit over lead scare</title>
		<link>https://www.ourstoryinsight.com/stanley-tumbler-maker-wont-have-to-face-class-action-suit-over-lead-scare/</link>
					<comments>https://www.ourstoryinsight.com/stanley-tumbler-maker-wont-have-to-face-class-action-suit-over-lead-scare/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 21:04:05 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[classaction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[face]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stanleytumbler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wont]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.ourstoryinsight.com/?p=14417</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A federal judge dismissed a proposed class-action lawsuit accusing the maker of Stanley tumblers of concealing that the popular water bottles contained lead. In a decision on Friday, U.S. District Judge Tana Lin in Seattle said consumers did not demonstrate a “specific and plausible risk of harm” from lead by using the tumblers, which are made by [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.ourstoryinsight.com/stanley-tumbler-maker-wont-have-to-face-class-action-suit-over-lead-scare/">Stanley tumbler maker won&#8217;t have to face class-action suit over lead scare</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.ourstoryinsight.com">Our Story Insight</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A federal judge dismissed a proposed class-action lawsuit accusing the maker of Stanley tumblers of concealing that the popular water bottles contained lead.</p>
<p>In a decision on Friday, U.S. District Judge Tana Lin in Seattle said consumers did not demonstrate a “specific and plausible risk of harm” from lead by using the tumblers, which are made by the defendant Pacific Market International.</p>
<p>The colorful tumblers are sometimes known as Stanley cups and became popular with help from social media influencers.</p>
<p>US District Judge Tana Lin said consumers did not demonstrate a “specific and plausible risk of harm” from lead by using the tumblers <span class="credit">AFP via Getty Images</span></p>
<p>Lawyers for the plaintiffs did not immediately respond to requests for comment on Monday. A lawyer for the defendant had no immediate comment.</p>
<p>Litigation over the tumblers began after reports of possible lead contamination went viral on social media in early 2024.</p>
<p>Pacific Market International, based in Seattle, said it used pellets to help keep tumblers’ contents at proper temperatures, and that while the pellets contained “some lead” it was inaccessible to consumers once sealed.</p>
<p>The plaintiffs said they would not have bought Stanley cups or would have paid less had they known the risk.</p>
<p>But in a 41-page decision, Lin said the plaintiffs did not show the use of lead in Stanley tumblers would be material to reasonable consumers.</p>
<p>Litigation over the tumblers began after reports of possible lead contamination went viral on social media in 2024. <span class="credit">Gado via Getty Images</span></p>
<p>She also found no showing that the mere presence of lead was dangerous, or that the pellets could contaminate the contents of Stanley tumblers, be ingested or be inhaled.</p>
<p>“Without even a hypothetical explanation of how any consumer might be harmed by the lead in defendant’s product, the problem remains that the dangers plaintiffs warn of are completely disconnected from the Stanley cups,” she wrote.</p>
<p>“If Stanley tumblers work as advertised and pose no plausible risk of harm, any representations by defendant that the tumblers are ‘safe and suitable for ordinary use’ cannot be shown to be ‘false’ or ‘misleading,&#8217;” she added.</p>
<p>Lin said the plaintiffs can amend their complaint, but if they do not fix its shortcomings “particularly as related to materiality” she will dismiss it for good.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.ourstoryinsight.com/stanley-tumbler-maker-wont-have-to-face-class-action-suit-over-lead-scare/">Stanley tumbler maker won&#8217;t have to face class-action suit over lead scare</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.ourstoryinsight.com">Our Story Insight</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.ourstoryinsight.com/stanley-tumbler-maker-wont-have-to-face-class-action-suit-over-lead-scare/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Meta Wins Major AI Copyright Suit</title>
		<link>https://www.ourstoryinsight.com/meta-wins-major-ai-copyright-suit/</link>
					<comments>https://www.ourstoryinsight.com/meta-wins-major-ai-copyright-suit/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2025 20:13:10 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Literature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[major]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wins]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.ourstoryinsight.com/?p=7874</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>This content contains affiliate links. When you buy through these links, we may earn an affiliate commission. Welcome to Today in Books, our daily round-up of literary headlines at the intersection of politics, culture, media, and more. What We Talk About When We Talk About Synergy Cynthia Erivo has announced a memoir of “powerful, personal [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.ourstoryinsight.com/meta-wins-major-ai-copyright-suit/">Meta Wins Major AI Copyright Suit</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.ourstoryinsight.com">Our Story Insight</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This content contains affiliate links. When you buy through these links, we may earn an affiliate commission.</p>
<p>Welcome to Today in Books, our daily round-up of literary headlines at the intersection of politics, culture, media, and more.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What We Talk About When We Talk About Synergy</h2>
<p>Cynthia Erivo has announced a memoir of “powerful, personal vignettes” intended for “anyone who has been told they’re too much.” Simply More will be released November 18, just days before Wicked: For Good hits theaters. You know it’s going to be killer on audio.</p>
<p>The book will use “vulnerable and enlightening” lessons from Erivo’s journey to “to help readers discover their true capabilities.” The multi-talented performer told PEOPLE she is hoping to “provide a little encouragement to anyone who is asking themselves and challenging themselves to be simply more.” An inspiring message from an inspiring star released alongside the second part of an inspiring story? That’s how you do it.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">That Old Bookish Magic</h2>
<p>What was the book that turned you into a capital-R Reader? At his Substack The New Dork Review of Books, original Book Riot contributor Greg Zimmerman reflects on the book that changed his life, and not just because it was the first one that compelled him to stay up all night reading. </p>
<p>It’s a novel about finding your destiny, about identifying what it is you are supposed to be doing, which for me I realized at that moment was trying to find more books like it. And if I couldn’t find more books like that one, I knew the quest would keep me happy for however long I got to stay on this floating rock in space.</p>
<p>It’s a lovely piece that taps into one of the best parts of being a book lover, and I so appreciate an opportunity to consider my own life-changing reads. The Sparrow. Gilead. Beloved. When Women Were Birds. Never Let Me Go. What would make your list? Let us know in the comments!</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">A Toolkit for the Next Generation of Activists</h2>
<p>Teens have become integral leaders in the fight against book bans, but it can be hard to know where to start if there’s not already an advocacy group in your school or neighborhood. Enter The Freedom to Read Teen Advocacy Toolkit, a robust program and toolkit built for library workers, educators, and community organizations working with today’s young people to support and bolster teen advocacy and activism. Bravo to the Brooklyn Public Library’s Books Unbanned program for creating an incredible resource. May their—and your—efforts succeed. Learn more about the toolkit here.</p>
<p>Today In Books</p>
<p>Sign up to Today In Books to receive daily news and miscellany from the world of books.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.ourstoryinsight.com/meta-wins-major-ai-copyright-suit/">Meta Wins Major AI Copyright Suit</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.ourstoryinsight.com">Our Story Insight</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.ourstoryinsight.com/meta-wins-major-ai-copyright-suit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Capital One to Pay $425 Million to Settle Suit Over Savings Accounts</title>
		<link>https://www.ourstoryinsight.com/capital-one-to-pay-425-million-to-settle-suit-over-savings-accounts/</link>
					<comments>https://www.ourstoryinsight.com/capital-one-to-pay-425-million-to-settle-suit-over-savings-accounts/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2025 20:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[accounts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[capital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[million]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[savings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Settle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suit]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.ourstoryinsight.com/?p=7081</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Capital One agreed to pay a $425 million settlement after it faced nationwide litigation accusing it of cheating savings depositors out of higher interest rates by failing to advertise higher-yield accounts, according to a federal court filing. The preliminary settlement, which is pending a judge’s approval, was filed in a notice on Friday in the [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.ourstoryinsight.com/capital-one-to-pay-425-million-to-settle-suit-over-savings-accounts/">Capital One to Pay $425 Million to Settle Suit Over Savings Accounts</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.ourstoryinsight.com">Our Story Insight</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p class="css-at9mc1 evys1bk0">Capital One agreed to pay a $425 million settlement after it faced nationwide litigation accusing it of cheating savings depositors out of higher interest rates by failing to advertise higher-yield accounts, according to a federal court filing.</p>
<p class="css-at9mc1 evys1bk0">The preliminary settlement, which is pending a judge’s approval, was filed in a notice on Friday in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia.</p>
<p class="css-at9mc1 evys1bk0">Depositors who sued the bank said that Capital One falsely promised higher interest rates on 360 Savings accounts, which had a fixed rate of 0.3 percent, and did not adequately advertise its better rates on 360 Performance Savings accounts.</p>
<p class="css-at9mc1 evys1bk0">The higher-yield account had an interest rate that was as high as more than 4 percent, according to the suit.</p>
<p class="css-at9mc1 evys1bk0">As a part of the settlement, $300 million will go to depositors to make up for the interest they would have earned in the higher-yield account.</p>
<p class="css-at9mc1 evys1bk0">The remainder of the settlement will go to depositors with open 360 Savings accounts as additional interest. Legal fees will also be paid out of the settlement.</p>
<p class="css-at9mc1 evys1bk0">As a part of the agreement, Capital One admitted no wrongdoing.</p>
<p class="css-at9mc1 evys1bk0">Representatives for Capital One and several lawyers for the plaintiffs did not immediately respond to requests for comment on Saturday.</p>
<p class="css-at9mc1 evys1bk0">The litigation in Virginia was combined from several separate lawsuits across the country.</p>
<p class="css-at9mc1 evys1bk0">On Wednesday, Letitia James, the New York attorney general, sued Capital One on behalf of depositors in her state for failing to notify 360 Savings account customers, who faced “artificially low” rates, that they could have switched to the account with better interest rates, according to a news release.</p>
<p class="css-at9mc1 evys1bk0">“Capital One assured high returns with no catches, then pulled the rug out from under their customers and hoped nobody would notice,” Ms. James said in the news release. “Big banks are not allowed to cheat their customers with false advertising and misleading promises.”</p>
<p class="css-at9mc1 evys1bk0">The suit brought by Ms. James was not subject to the settlement filed on Friday. Capital One said it would defend itself in court and rejected her claims.</p>
<p class="css-at9mc1 evys1bk0">The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau similarly sued the bank at the close of President Joseph R. Biden Jr.’s term in January, arguing that Capital One cheated consumers out of more than $2 billion in interest payments. The Trump administration has since dropped that case.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.ourstoryinsight.com/capital-one-to-pay-425-million-to-settle-suit-over-savings-accounts/">Capital One to Pay $425 Million to Settle Suit Over Savings Accounts</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.ourstoryinsight.com">Our Story Insight</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.ourstoryinsight.com/capital-one-to-pay-425-million-to-settle-suit-over-savings-accounts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Alabama Public Library Service Defunds Fairhope Public Library; City Council Will Not Follow Suit</title>
		<link>https://www.ourstoryinsight.com/alabama-public-library-service-defunds-fairhope-public-library-city-council-will-not-follow-suit/</link>
					<comments>https://www.ourstoryinsight.com/alabama-public-library-service-defunds-fairhope-public-library-city-council-will-not-follow-suit/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2025 05:06:24 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Literature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alabama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defunds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fairhope]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[follow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Library]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suit]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.ourstoryinsight.com/?p=6056</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Kelly is a former librarian and a long-time blogger at STACKED. She&#8217;s the editor/author of (DON&#8217;T) CALL ME CRAZY: 33 VOICES START THE CONVERSATION ABOUT MENTAL HEALTH and the editor/author of HERE WE ARE: FEMINISM FOR THE REAL WORLD. Her next book, BODY TALK, will publish in Fall 2020. Follow her on Instagram @heykellyjensen. View [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.ourstoryinsight.com/alabama-public-library-service-defunds-fairhope-public-library-city-council-will-not-follow-suit/">Alabama Public Library Service Defunds Fairhope Public Library; City Council Will Not Follow Suit</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.ourstoryinsight.com">Our Story Insight</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>			<span class="author-bio--auth-inner"></p>
<p class="author-bio--description">Kelly is a former librarian and a long-time blogger at STACKED. She&#8217;s the editor/author of (DON&#8217;T) CALL ME CRAZY: 33 VOICES START THE CONVERSATION ABOUT MENTAL HEALTH and the editor/author of HERE WE ARE: FEMINISM FOR THE REAL WORLD. Her next book, BODY TALK, will publish in Fall 2020. Follow her on Instagram @heykellyjensen.</p>
<p class="author-bio--posts-link">View All posts by Kelly Jensen</p>
<p>			</span></p>
<p>On Thursday, March 20,  the Alabama Public Library Service Board of Trustees (APLS) voted to defund the Fairhope Public Library (FPL). APLS Chairman John Wahl stated that the library was violating state policies related to protecting children from “inappropriate” material in the library. </p>
<p>Wahl, who was appointed Chair of the APLS in September 2024, is also the current chairman of the Alabama Republican Party. One of the Republican Party’s goals under Alabama Governor Kay Ivey over the last several years has been targeting library funding. </p>
<p>In 2024, Alabama updated its laws and administrative codes, permitting the APLS to withhold funds from libraries that do not have policies which remove or restrict “sexually explicit or other material deemed inappropriate” for minors. Like other states passing such bills, there is no clear definition of “sexually explicit” or “inappropriate.” This is intentional–it allows for interpretation at the will of whoever is in charge. It also undermines the prevailing standard for obscenity as defined by the Miller Test. </p>
<p>The Fairhope Public Library is the first public library in Alabama to lose their funding as a result of these new policies. While it has earned this unfortunate distinction, Fairhope is far from the first library to see local book censors champion defunding. A similar unsuccessful proposal was made for Athens Limestone Public Library in May last year. </p>
<p>Though most members of the APLS voted in favor of defunding the library at the meeting, there was one notable exception. Ron Snider, who represents the Fairhope district on the board, said the decision was highly inappropriate. His vote would echo what other leaders in the Fairhope community would say in the coming days: the APLS’s decision and demands do not reflect the will of the people. </p>
<p>Literary Activism Newsletter</p>
<p>
News you can use plus tips and tools for the fight against censorship and other bookish activism!
</p>
<p>Thank you for signing up! Keep an eye on your inbox.</p>
<p>APLS did not name the books it considers inappropriate that are available in the FPL collection. Several could be readily identified, though, based on public complaints to the APLS, including Sold by Patricia McCormick, Grown by Tiffany D. Jackson, and Tricks by Ellen Hopkins. All three books are written for teens and available in FPL’s teen section. These books are not the same ones challenged in the library back in April 2024 from a list compiled by Brian Dasinger, a member of the Baldwin County Conservative Coalition. Dasinger has been a staple at FPL board meetings as an advocate of banning books with topics he deems “inappropriate” for minors. The vast majority, as is the case in nearly every book ban situation nationwide, are by or about people of color and LGBTQ+ people.  </p>
<p>Wahl noted that state law requires removal of the books out of youth areas in order to receive funding, insisting that such policy does not amount to book banning. These claims mirror those made by champions of book banning throughout the state of Alabama, including Clean Up Alabama and several local Moms For Liberty chapters. </p>
<p>Whether or not such a policy to move books falls under “banning” doesn’t matter. Relocating materials from where they belong in a library is book censorship by any and all definitions and goes against the ethical practices of libraries. All of this plays into the ongoing and pointless arguments made by book banners that what their goals are are simply to “curate” collections. What banners claim was limited to the public schools has clearly been anything but–the plan all along has been to re-define language and intent in order to take over public institutions. </p>
<p>On Monday, March 24, the Fairhope City Council met for the first time since the news of the APLS’s plan to defund the local library. Though the City Council has little control over the operations of FPL, they are the library’s primary funding source. All the Fairhope City Council members in attendance affirmed their support of the library and extended empathy to the library staff for the undue stress they are experiencing. </p>
<p>Wahl was in communication with Fairhope’s mayor, Sherry Sullivan, who is confident that the APLS and the library can find a compromise. But per Wahl’s own doubling down on the decision, that won’t happen until the books are relocated. </p>
<p>“We want to make it absolutely clear—non-compliance with APLS code is not an option. There are no gray areas, loopholes, or exceptions when it comes to keeping sexually explicit materials out of children’s sections,” he said in a statement issued Monday. “These are common-sense requirements that prevent innocent children from accidentally stumbling across sexually explicit material without their parents’ consent. Any library that refuses to move these books to the adult section will not receive state funding. Period.”</p>
<p>The City Council contributed $1.2 million to the Fairhope Public Library budget last year. The APLS cuts would amount to about $42,000–an amount that local pro-library, anti-book censorship advocates with Read Freely Alabama are hoping to raise to help keep the library open. The group has been on the ground defending Fairhope Public Library from attacks from the beginning. In four days, they’ve already come close to meeting their fundraising goal, bringing in nearly $39,000 in donations.</p>
<p>That would help keep the library open at the same service level it is now for at least 18 months. </p>
<p>Fairhope Public Library has been a book censorship hotspot during this era of unprecedented attacks on democratic institutions like public libraries. Things ramped up in September 2023, when members of the group Faith, Family, Freedom Coalition of Baldwin County began to show up to City Council meetings with complaints over the books available on the library’s shelves. These complaints were paired with calls to withhold funding until said titles were removed. </p>
<p>By October 2024, the library implemented a new policy that requires parental permission for anyone under 18 to borrow books from certain areas of the library. But this move wasn’t enough for the far-right groups who are obsessed with gender and sexuality. The Baldwin County chapter of Moms For Liberty took aim at the library’s board, and alongside Clean Up Alabama, have pushed to see the board chair fired for not moving books they have deemed “inappropriate.” Despite those complaints, three members of the library’s board who have worked hard to ensure equitable access to books were reappointed earlier this year. Clean Up Alabama then called for the City Council to withhold $225,000 in funding to the library until the books were removed. </p>
<p>It is very likely that because these far-right special interest groups did not get their way that they saw their opportunity by going straight to the APLS. This has been a pattern happening nationwide–when individuals don’t get their way in terms of banning materials locally, they go up the chain as far as they can. This is why Samuels Public Library in Virginia is still under attack several years on–the handful of church members who didn’t get their way with the library board have managed to get the county to create its own governing board in order to exert power–and it’s why parents like Elizabeth Szalai, who challenged dozens of books without success in Beaufort County Schools (SC) has now simply taken her complaints to the South Carolina Department of Education. </p>
<p>The Fairhope Public Library board won’t meet again until April 21, leaving questions about what will or won’t happen to the library and its funding. One thing is clear though, and that’s that the vast majority of the people in Fairhope, as well as its own leadership at the city and institutional level, do not agree with the decisions being made on their behalf by APLS. </p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.ourstoryinsight.com/alabama-public-library-service-defunds-fairhope-public-library-city-council-will-not-follow-suit/">Alabama Public Library Service Defunds Fairhope Public Library; City Council Will Not Follow Suit</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.ourstoryinsight.com">Our Story Insight</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.ourstoryinsight.com/alabama-public-library-service-defunds-fairhope-public-library-city-council-will-not-follow-suit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Elon Musk received summons in SEC suit over Twitter disclosure</title>
		<link>https://www.ourstoryinsight.com/elon-musk-received-summons-in-sec-suit-over-twitter-disclosure/</link>
					<comments>https://www.ourstoryinsight.com/elon-musk-received-summons-in-sec-suit-over-twitter-disclosure/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2025 08:50:31 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disclosure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Musk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[received]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[summons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.ourstoryinsight.com/?p=5963</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Tesla CEO Elon Musk looks on as US President Donald Trump speaks to the press as they stand next to a Tesla vehicle on the South Portico of the White House on March 11, 2025 in Washington, DC.  Mandel Ngan &#124; AFP &#124; Getty Images Elon Musk received a court summons last week in connection [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.ourstoryinsight.com/elon-musk-received-summons-in-sec-suit-over-twitter-disclosure/">Elon Musk received summons in SEC suit over Twitter disclosure</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.ourstoryinsight.com">Our Story Insight</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="HighlightShare-hidden" style="top:0;left:0"/></p>
<p>Tesla CEO Elon Musk looks on as US President Donald Trump speaks to the press as they stand next to a Tesla vehicle on the South Portico of the White House on March 11, 2025 in Washington, DC. </p>
<p>Mandel Ngan | AFP | Getty Images</p>
<p>Elon Musk received a court summons last week in connection with the SEC&#8217;s lawsuit over his alleged failure to properly disclose purchases of Twitter stock in 2022 before bidding to buy the company, according to a filing on Thursday.</p>
<p>A process server delivered the civil summons to Musk on March 14, at the headquarters of SpaceX in Brownsville, Texas, the filing said. The server noted that upon his arrival at the SpaceX facility, three different security guards refused to accept the documents, and one told him he was trespassing. He &#8220;placed the documents on the ground,&#8221; and left while the guards photographed him and his car.</p>
<p>The summons pertains to a case concerning Musk&#8217;s eventual purchase of Twitter, now known as X, for $44 billion in 2022. Prior to the acquisition, Musk built up a position in the company of greater than 5%, which would&#8217;ve required disclosing his holdings to the public within 10 calendar days of reaching that threshold.</p>
<p>According to the SEC&#8217;s civil complaint, filed in U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C., in January, Musk was more than 10 days late in reporting that material information, &#8220;allowing him to underpay by at least $150 million for shares he purchased after his financial beneficial ownership report was due.&#8221;</p>
<p>Once he took over Twitter, Musk used the platform to promote then-candidate and now President Donald Trump, and other Republican candidates and causes. Musk, who&#8217;s also CEO of <span class="QuoteInBody-quoteNameContainer" data-test="QuoteInBody" id="RegularArticle-QuoteInBody-4">Tesla<span class="QuoteInBody-inlineButton"><span class="AddToWatchlistButton-watchlistContainer" id="-WatchlistDropdown" data-analytics-id="-WatchlistDropdown"><span class="AddToWatchlistButton-addWatchListFromTag"/></span></span></span>, spent some $290 million to help propel Trump back to the White House and now serves within the administration as a top advisor to the president.</p>
<p>An answer from Musk, or his attorneys, is due on April 4. Musk has the option to dismiss by that date.</p>
<p>The SEC, Elon Musk, and Quinn Emanuel Partner Alex Spiro, his lawyer, didn&#8217;t immediately respond to requests for comment.</p>
<p>Trump&#8217;s White House has directed deep cuts in the budget and staff of independent federal regulatory agencies, including the SEC. The regulator offered $50,000 to many of its employees, encouraging them to resign or retire by March 21.</p>
<p>The Trump administration has also reversed a 15-year-old policy that allowed the SEC&#8217;s director of enforcement to issue formal orders of investigation. The agency will now require requests for formal orders of investigation to be pitched to and approved by a vote of SEC commissioners, a change likely to slow down probes like the one that led to the SEC&#8217;s suit against Musk.</p>
<p>Musk previously settled civil securities fraud charges brought by the SEC at Tesla, his autos business. In that matter, Musk and Tesla each had to pay $20 million in fines, and Musk had to temporarily relinquish his role as chairman of the Tesla board.</p>
<p><strong>WATCH:</strong> Ron Baron on Elon Musk</p>
<p><span class="InlineVideo-videoButton"/><span/></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.ourstoryinsight.com/elon-musk-received-summons-in-sec-suit-over-twitter-disclosure/">Elon Musk received summons in SEC suit over Twitter disclosure</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.ourstoryinsight.com">Our Story Insight</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.ourstoryinsight.com/elon-musk-received-summons-in-sec-suit-over-twitter-disclosure/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>CrowdStrike moves to dismiss Delta suit, citing contract terms</title>
		<link>https://www.ourstoryinsight.com/crowdstrike-moves-to-dismiss-delta-suit-citing-contract-terms/</link>
					<comments>https://www.ourstoryinsight.com/crowdstrike-moves-to-dismiss-delta-suit-citing-contract-terms/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2024 04:57:29 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrowdStrike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dismiss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terms]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.ourstoryinsight.com/?p=4159</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A Boeing 767-332(ER) from Delta Air Lines takes off from Barcelona El Prat Airport in Barcelona, Spain, on October 8, 2024.  Joan Valls &#124; Nurphoto &#124; Getty Images CrowdStrike moved Monday evening to dismiss Delta Air Lines&#8217; lawsuit around the July cybersecurity outage that led to canceled flights and stranded passengers, arguing that the airline&#8217;s [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.ourstoryinsight.com/crowdstrike-moves-to-dismiss-delta-suit-citing-contract-terms/">CrowdStrike moves to dismiss Delta suit, citing contract terms</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.ourstoryinsight.com">Our Story Insight</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="HighlightShare-hidden" style="top:0;left:0"/></p>
<p>A Boeing 767-332(ER) from Delta Air Lines takes off from Barcelona El Prat Airport in Barcelona, Spain, on October 8, 2024. </p>
<p>Joan Valls | Nurphoto | Getty Images</p>
<p><span class="QuoteInBody-quoteNameContainer" data-test="QuoteInBody" id="SpecialReportArticle-QuoteInBody-1">CrowdStrike<span class="QuoteInBody-inlineButton"><span class="AddToWatchlistButton-watchlistContainer" id="-WatchlistDropdown" data-analytics-id="-WatchlistDropdown"><span class="AddToWatchlistButton-addWatchListFromTag"/></span></span></span> moved Monday evening to dismiss <span class="QuoteInBody-quoteNameContainer" data-test="QuoteInBody" id="SpecialReportArticle-QuoteInBody-2">Delta Air Lines&#8217;<span class="QuoteInBody-inlineButton"><span class="AddToWatchlistButton-watchlistContainer" id="-WatchlistDropdown" data-analytics-id="-WatchlistDropdown"><span class="AddToWatchlistButton-addWatchListFromTag"/></span></span></span> lawsuit around the July cybersecurity outage that led to canceled flights and stranded passengers, arguing that the airline&#8217;s litigation was an attempt to circumvent the contract between the two companies.</p>
<p>The agreement between CrowdStrike and Delta includes a clause limiting CrowdStrike&#8217;s liability and a cap on damages, which the cybersecurity provider says Delta is now trying to skirt. CrowdStrike also argued in its filing that Georgia law prevents Delta from converting a breach of contract into tort claims. Delta is based in Atlanta.</p>
<p>&#8220;As an initial matter, Georgia&#8217;s economic loss rule specifically precludes Delta&#8217;s efforts to recover through tort claims the economic damages it claims to have suffered,&#8221; CrowdStrike wrote.</p>
<p>Delta said the July cybersecurity outage cost the company more than $500 million in canceled flights, refunds and passenger accommodations. It is seeking to recoup those costs from CrowdStrike through the suit. But the damage done to Delta&#8217;s reputation as a premium carrier can&#8217;t yet be quantified, nor has the impact of a Department of Transportation investigation into Delta over the outage.</p>
<p>Delta continues to rely on CrowdStrike services following the outage, likely because it is extremely difficult to change cybersecurity providers in systems as large and complicated as Delta&#8217;s. </p>
<p>Still, CrowdStrike said it moved quickly to try and help Delta — offers the cybersecurity company says were rebuffed. &#8220;We are good for now,&#8221; one message from a Delta executive cited by CrowdStrike read. The cybersecurity company said its executives were in close contact on the day of the outage.</p>
<p>&#8220;Delta repeatedly rebuffed any assistance from CrowdStrike or its partners,&#8221; CrowdStrike wrote.</p>
<p>CrowdStrike further argues that Delta&#8217;s own practices and systems led to the widespread delays and cancellations, unlike other industry peers who recovered much more quickly from the outage.</p>
<p>&#8220;Delta was an outlier. Although Delta acknowledges that it took just hours—not days—for Delta employees to&#8221; remediate the outage, CrowdStrike wrote in its filing, &#8220;cancellations far exceeded the flight disruptions its peer airlines experienced.&#8221;</p>
<p>The cybersecurity company&#8217;s stock took a sharp hit after the outage, plunging 44%. It&#8217;s since largely recovered from those losses, posting strong quarterly results even after lowering its guidance due to the incident. CrowdStrike has been helped by the relative stickiness of its products, especially at large enterprises.</p>
<p>A Delta spokesperson was not immediately available for comment.</p>
<h2 class="RelatedContent-header">Don’t miss these insights from CNBC PRO</h2>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.ourstoryinsight.com/crowdstrike-moves-to-dismiss-delta-suit-citing-contract-terms/">CrowdStrike moves to dismiss Delta suit, citing contract terms</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.ourstoryinsight.com">Our Story Insight</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.ourstoryinsight.com/crowdstrike-moves-to-dismiss-delta-suit-citing-contract-terms/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Delta suit against CrowdStrike after IT outage caused cancellations</title>
		<link>https://www.ourstoryinsight.com/delta-suit-against-crowdstrike-after-it-outage-caused-cancellations/</link>
					<comments>https://www.ourstoryinsight.com/delta-suit-against-crowdstrike-after-it-outage-caused-cancellations/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Oct 2024 01:59:03 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cancellations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[caused]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CrowdStrike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[outage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suit]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.ourstoryinsight.com/?p=3669</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Delta Air Lines planes are seen at John F. Kennedy International Airport on the July 4th weekend in Queens, New York City, U.S., July 2, 2022.  Andrew Kelly &#124; Reuters Delta Air Lines on Friday filed a lawsuit against CrowdStrike in Georgia, accusing the security software vendor of breach of contract and negligence after an [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.ourstoryinsight.com/delta-suit-against-crowdstrike-after-it-outage-caused-cancellations/">Delta suit against CrowdStrike after IT outage caused cancellations</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.ourstoryinsight.com">Our Story Insight</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="HighlightShare-hidden" style="top:0;left:0"/></p>
<p>Delta Air Lines planes are seen at John F. Kennedy International Airport on the July 4th weekend in Queens, New York City, U.S., July 2, 2022. </p>
<p>Andrew Kelly | Reuters</p>
<p><span class="QuoteInBody-quoteNameContainer" data-test="QuoteInBody" id="RegularArticle-QuoteInBody-1">Delta Air Lines<span class="QuoteInBody-inlineButton"><span class="AddToWatchlistButton-watchlistContainer" id="-WatchlistDropdown" data-analytics-id="-WatchlistDropdown"><span class="AddToWatchlistButton-addWatchListFromTag"/></span></span></span> on Friday filed a lawsuit against <span class="QuoteInBody-quoteNameContainer" data-test="QuoteInBody" id="RegularArticle-QuoteInBody-2">CrowdStrike<span class="QuoteInBody-inlineButton"><span class="AddToWatchlistButton-watchlistContainer" id="-WatchlistDropdown" data-analytics-id="-WatchlistDropdown"><span class="AddToWatchlistButton-addWatchListFromTag"/></span></span></span> in Georgia, accusing the security software vendor of breach of contract and negligence after an outage in July that brought down millions of computers and prompted 7,000 flight cancelations.</p>
<p>Other airlines recovered more quickly than Atlanta-based Delta, which said the incident reduced revenue by $380 million and brought $170 million in costs. The flawed software update affected computers running Microsoft&#8217;s Windows operating system.</p>
<p>Days after the outage, Delta hired David Boies of law firm Boies Schiller Flexner to seek damages from CrowdStrike and <span class="QuoteInBody-quoteNameContainer" data-test="QuoteInBody" id="RegularArticle-QuoteInBody-6">Microsoft<span class="QuoteInBody-inlineButton"><span class="AddToWatchlistButton-watchlistContainer" id="-WatchlistDropdown" data-analytics-id="-WatchlistDropdown"><span class="AddToWatchlistButton-addWatchListFromTag"/></span></span></span>. Delta asked for damages to cover its losses, along with litigation costs and punitive damages.</p>
<p>&#8220;CrowdStrike caused a global catastrophe because it cut corners, took shortcuts, and circumvented the very testing and certification processes it advertised, for its own benefit and profit,&#8221; Delta said in its complaint. &#8220;If CrowdStrike had tested the Faulty Update on even one computer before deployment, the computer would have crashed.&#8221;</p>
<p>Delta had disabled automatic updates from CrowdStrike but this one reached its computers anyway, the airline said in the suit. Delta claimed that CrowdStrike&#8217;s Falcon software created and exploited an unauthorized door in Windows that the airline said it never would have allowed.</p>
<p>&#8220;The havoc that was created deserves, in my opinion, to be fully compensated for,&#8221; Delta CEO Ed Bastian told CNBC in an interview earlier this month.</p>
<p>CEO George Kurtz has apologized for the incident, and the company has committed to changing its practices to prevent similar events. In August, CrowdStrike lowered its full-year guidance because of a customer commitment package related to the outage.</p>
<p>&#8220;While we aimed to reach a business resolution that puts customers first, Delta has chosen a different path,&#8221; a CrowdStrike spokesperson told CNBC in an email. &#8220;Delta&#8217;s claims are based on disproven misinformation, demonstrate a lack of understanding of how modern cybersecurity works, and reflect a desperate attempt to shift blame for its slow recovery away from its failure to modernize its antiquated IT infrastructure.&#8221;</p>
<p>Microsoft discussed various potential enhancements with CrowdStrike and other endpoint security software sellers at a summit in September.</p>
<p><strong>WATCH:</strong> Delta fires back at CrowdStrike, says outage cost $380 million in revenue</p>
<p><span class="InlineVideo-videoButton"/><span/></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.ourstoryinsight.com/delta-suit-against-crowdstrike-after-it-outage-caused-cancellations/">Delta suit against CrowdStrike after IT outage caused cancellations</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.ourstoryinsight.com">Our Story Insight</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.ourstoryinsight.com/delta-suit-against-crowdstrike-after-it-outage-caused-cancellations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
